5 Questions Fauci and FDA Need to Answer on Pfizer and Moderna Vaccines

The Most Revolutionary Act

By Lyn Redwood, RN, MSN

As reports surfaced today of yet another healthcare worker who suffered a severe allergic reaction to Pfizer’s COVID vaccine, it’s time the FDA and Fauci explain what they plan to do about it.

In light of these events, and because CHD previously warned the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) officials and Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), about the potential for the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines to cause anaphylactic reactions, we have some questions we’d like Fauci and the FDA to answer.

They are:

View original post 511 more words

Trump Threatens to Veto COVID Relief Bill

The Most Revolutionary Act

Outgoing President Donald Trump, Washington, DC, U.S., 2020.

Outgoing President Donald Trump, Washington, DC, U.S., 2020. | Photo: EFE

Telesur

He wants Congress to increase the amount in the stimulus checks to US$2,000 for individuals or US$4,000 for couples.

U.S. President Donald Trump on Tuesday lashed out at lawmakers over the newly approved US$900-billion COVID-19 relief package, threatening not to sign the bill if changes are not made to increase the amount of stimulus checks.

“The bill they are now planning to send back to my desk is much different than anticipated… It really is a disgrace,” the outgoing President said, arguing that it contains many measures that almost have nothing to do with COVID-19, such as foreign assistance funds, funding for John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, and the Smithsonian Institution.

The U.S. House of Representatives and Senate both approved the relief package late Monday, along with US$1.4 trillion in government funding for the rest of the 2021…

View original post 98 more words

Do Lockdowns Work? Research Evidence (24 Studies) Suggests Not

The Most Revolutionary Act

lockdown advertisement notice© Christopher Thomond/The Guardian

Posted by Nikipedia meets Orwell 1984
American Institute for Economic Research SOTT net

The use of universal lockdowns in the event of the appearance of a new pathogen has no precedent. It has been a science experiment in real time, with most of the human population used as lab rats. The costs are legion.

The question is whether lockdowns worked to control the virus in a way that is scientifically verifiable. Based on the following studies, the answer is no and for a variety of reasons: bad data, no correlations, no causal demonstration, anomalous exceptions, and so on. There is no relationship between lockdowns (or whatever else people want to call them to mask their true nature) and virus control.

Perhaps this is a shocking revelation, given that universal social and economic controls are becoming the new orthodoxy. In a saner world, the burden of proof…

View original post 675 more words